Fact-Checking Policy
The Association of Professional Interior Design (APID) is committed to publishing accurate and reliable content. This Fact-Checking Policy outlines our standards and procedures for ensuring the integrity of the information presented on apid.ae. Our readers trust us for truthful insights into the world of interior design, architecture, and luxury residences.
Our Commitment to Accuracy
APID maintains high journalistic standards. We believe accurate information empowers our readers and respects the professionals we feature. Every piece of content published on apid.ae aims for factual correctness, particularly when discussing project specifications, historical context, or design trends.
Verification Process Before Publication
Before any article goes live, our editorial team undertakes a rigorous verification process. We confirm all factual statements, statistics, names, dates, and direct quotes. This step ensures the information aligns with established data and reputable sources. Our goal is to present only verified information to our audience.
Prioritized Sources
We rely on authoritative and trustworthy sources for our content. These include:
- Primary Sources: Original documents, official statements from architectural firms, design studios, or property developers, direct interviews with designers and clients, and first-hand accounts.
- Official Sources: Reports and data from government bodies, regulatory agencies, established industry associations, and academic institutions.
- Peer-Reviewed Sources: Research papers and studies published in recognized academic journals.
We do not use anonymous sources for factual claims. Information attributed to an individual or organization must come from an identifiable and credible origin.
Evaluating Claims
Each factual claim in an article is assessed based on the strength and reliability of its supporting evidence. We check if the evidence directly supports the claim without misinterpretation. We also consider the source’s expertise and potential biases. Discrepancies between sources prompt further investigation or exclusion of the claim.
Handling Unverifiable Claims
If a claim cannot be substantiated by multiple credible sources or primary evidence, we do not publish it as a fact. Such statements are either omitted or presented as speculation or opinion, clearly attributed to a source. Our editorial team will not proceed with publication until essential facts are verified.
Distinguishing Fact from Opinion
APID recognizes the difference between factual reporting and subjective viewpoints. Facts are objectively verifiable statements supported by evidence. Opinions are personal interpretations, beliefs, or judgments, common in design commentary and critiques.
We ensure that opinions, whether from our writers or quoted experts, are clearly identified. They are never presented as objective truths. This clear distinction helps readers understand the nature of the information they consume, especially regarding design aesthetics or future trends.
Reporting Inaccuracies
APID encourages our readers to help us maintain accuracy. If you believe you have identified an error, inaccuracy, or omission in our content, please contact us immediately. We take all feedback seriously and review it promptly.
Please send your reports to [email protected]. Include the article title, publication date, the specific information you believe is incorrect, and any supporting evidence. Our editorial team aims to acknowledge all reports within three business days. We will then investigate the claim and implement corrections where necessary, clearly noting updates on the article page.
Policy Updates
APID may update this Fact-Checking Policy periodically to reflect best practices and changes in our editorial process. We recommend reviewing this page occasionally for any revisions. This policy was last updated in March 2026.